代写论文-Modern literary theory
Synopsis: modernity is a rational spirit prompted the community to continue to go to science and progress, the spirit of the Enlightenment, a highly developed scientific spirit and humanistic spirit, it affects our material and spiritual civilization construction today reflect modern thinking should not be thinking of one or the other, but should be toward tolerance, dialogue, comprehensive innovation also contains the either-or thinking He also vital. literature in the new ideas, the theory of progress in modernity instigated , continue to distinguish between policy and theory, initially established in the management of their own learning, autonomy awareness of the process in literature and art preliminary rid of political groups, awareness, aesthetic consciousness occurred upheaval, modern aesthetic consciousness awareness of the general public aesthetic groups continue to generate the process; literature and art the emergence of anti-modern phenomenon, and its by criticism, the paradox of modernity and its potential to reflect.
Modern problems of modernity and its evolution by the attention from the cultural sector for over 10 years.
In my opinion, the so-called modernity, is the promotion of the society into the modern stage of development, the community continue to go to science and progress in a rational spirit, the spirit of the Enlightenment, is a highly developed scientific spirit and humanistic spirit is the spirit of a modern consciousness, performance for scientific, humane, rational, democracy, freedom, equality, rights, the universal principles of the rule of law. European and American academia around modern issue has been discussed for several hundred years, in its evolution, roughly formed Marxist School Weber-liberal school of thought and the modern concept of the conservative school of thought, the development of the the recently there Habermas modern theory of communicative rationality factions.
In the case of the constant pursuit of modern consciousness, modernity, Europe and the United States and other countries, the establishment of a highly developed material and spiritual civilization. Modernity own inherent contradictions inherent in the process of rational spirit constantly, causing imbalances rational spirit transforming them as they talk about practical tools rational height of the rapid progress of science and technology and material production shows unlimited potential, but the formation of a rapid expansion of the human material desires, resulting in the matter of human squeeze and the growing impoverishment of the human spirit, and makes in spirit always caught the survival predicament. while in the other hand, over the past century has malleable, carry forward the social science of the human spirit, and in providing a variety of knowledge to expand understanding of the community, to deepen people on their own understanding at the same time, in different populations, Group hands, and so the rational becomes anti-rational, and towards the reactionary, causing all sorts of crisis and turmoil, to the society and the masses manufactured one after another in the near-destruction of a disaster, which lost not only make their own authority, but also deepening the crisis of the human spirit.
The 20th century, many European and American philosophers, poets, writers, according to their own understanding of modernity, the above phenomenon or interpretation and critique, or poetic revolt reveal under capitalism, technological development, and the coming of the information society contradiction. their technology first, issue exclaimed with warnings the instrumental rationality comprehensive victory, deeply worried about the increasing decline of the human spirit, their voices filled the tragedy of the human consciousness. novelists use absurd tactics, human survival in the absurd phenomenon even survival itself absurd, art show value, under the shadow of coverage, constantly digestion and destruction of modern development, logic from its own brewing all aspects of anti-modernity, and intensified, the formation of anti-modern ideology was the critique of modernity, this anti-modern, especially the humanities, philosophy, aesthetics, criticism. Naturally, this is not against modernity, but criticism of the modern “kai more negative things, that is critical to all aspects of instrumental rationality, pseudo-science, anti-modernity manifested. This critical that scientific, rational modernity itself the spirit of the powerful potential of this critical precisely the modernity all features.
The Western scholars modernity of the last several decades ago of the 20th century, the spirit of social, academic trend, located in the modernist, modernist look into the final form of modernity, the crisis of modernism as a modern crisis ①. the standard cite the principle of modernity, to critique modernity uncontrolled expansion critique of modernity itself reverse alienation become degenerate, is indeed the dominant tendencies of the last century, modern and cultural trends, especially in the critical philosophy of this century, the the skewer particularly intense. However, the modernization of the drawbacks of previous non-modernist modernist philosophy, aesthetics, literary genre, has long been discovered, and some criticism, so do not say, only modernism exemplifies modernity. We can not critique of modernity negative aspects of a variety of philosophical, aesthetic, literary, are classified as modernism into Modernism track when the rise of the philosophy of language theory, especially deconstruction and its closely related postmodernism after modernism became the object of criticism, original thinking and narrative mode generally been deconstructed and further was the disintegration of the value and spirit of the people. alternative modernism, postmodernism announced Thus modernity became declared obsolete. however, we know that a wide range of cultural criticism, anti-modern phenomenon did not stop if completely modernity positioning modernism, so many anti-modernity critique can exist forever? criticism Does it necessarily postmodernism criticized? I am afraid that is not necessarily the case for example, we in fact also the negative aspects of modernity with a critical, but it is a modern cultural critique.
Natural, postmodernism can be said is a critical.
Cultural criticism, however, from the viewpoint of postmodernism and modern cultural criticism, is not consistent with the modern cultural criticism is still exploring the positive factors, the need to safeguard the existence of the human universal values and universal spirit, in order to value and spirit of reconstruction be destroyed, the critique here is to enrich and update; postmodern criticism is to subvert the old value, said to re-shape a person’s self-image, often very smart, witty reprove all the modernity is not, and to treat them as the entire contents of modernity, and thus negate modernity.
“We can, and should abandon modernity, in fact, we must do so, otherwise, we and most life on Earth will be difficult to escape the fate of destruction.” ② The In fact, even in Europe and the United States, if you want a society for normal development consciousness of modernity and modernity establish discourse authority, even if a part is out of date, its basic principles, the spirit or often new people survive even for a moment can not leave. in this regard, perhaps the German philosopher Habei Ma Sri Lanka believe that modernity is unfinished business point of view, it seems more reasonable to ③ The.
Against modern postmodern philosophy indeed see people the old thinking of the limitations of the new concept of the regulation of human relations, they can be used to illustrate the causes of some phenomenon of modern society, and many other negative phenomena .
In my opinion, these positive factors as the modern consciousness factors blend of modernity, rich modernity, but it is difficult to supplant still play dominated the social life of modern modernity expulsion from real life out, progress will undoubtedly real life lost point, even to enter the era of capitalist globalization, and undoubtedly would have been the normal social development needs a great deal of resistance by the humanities, philosophy, aesthetics, criticism in today’s so-called globalization, is through the international financial capital, information technology, jointly with organizations in the world between countries to form a close liaison with political, economic, and cultural relations of mutual restraint, it makes the world’s countries in the political, economic, cultural, toward formally the same with the integration. But for the underdeveloped countries of the political, economic, cultural, globalization is a sense of participation, to develop their own active participation., They look to the modern and developed countries advocated modernity is not consistent As for the future, the modern connotation may change or become complicated, but the principle and spirit, no doubt will exist for a long time to go.
For us, I think that reflects the spirit of the modern consciousness of modernity is not outdated. Hundred years, China’s social modernization is very tortuous road many great changes in our society, we can accelerate the modernization of the process, but the modern stage of development of society appears to be a long road, difficult to be surpassed. We have long wanted super super that velvet on the results these blind leap gave people caused numerous material and spiritual pain. Pain in one written in the early 1920s, Russia’s dystopian novel >> << us, as much as such a huge force of prophecy, and can not but cause us to think deeply. would also seem that the principles and spirit of modernity.
Modernity has been repeatedly distorted the today need new integration. For now, the majority of the crowd was not found in the material to breathe fully modern life breath is also true in spirit to make society into the modern country on the path of modernization the road, we had a lot of people, now, how many people are in shaping modern in the 20th century, some scholars of modern Western society, as China’s modern to carry forward, and also by mail total Westernization But early in the second half of the 19th century, Western modernity had exposed the other hand all the contradictions, has more crises after the May 4th Movement copy, but this style of study has been criticized by the people. others to disseminate the Marxist theory, combined with China’s actual Chinese society has opened a new era, but to the 1950s, and the default of the Soviet Union today is our tomorrow, and turned it into a series of mass movement, a different opinion on political eliminating This is actually a typical copy modernity alternative blind subjectivity, due to entrenched Oriental learning still has not come to an end, resulting in science become a modern superstition, the ideal has been distorted for long been criticized utopian, man-made disasters again and again, so that modernity toward the “Cultural Revolution” feudal fascist toward reactionary social development has been tremendous damage to the brink of collapse, people spiritual home almost ruined ruins, and has so far failed to make people mentally out of its shadow which has become a the generations Mingxinkegu era feeling, no doubt, this will be a long-term cleanup of the history of ideas.
80 years of reform and opening up era, some of the pain in their own backward, eyes glued to the modern West, that the West today is our tomorrow, that this is the modern spirit, then set off again westernize the tide in our thinking sector, academia has a wide range of performance. literary studies, long ago read the essay ④ Qian Liqun talking about the 1980s he proposed the concept of the “20th Century Chinese Literature” with their peers. notion that does not lie words to express itself, but in its exposition made. Advocates of the interpretation of the notion, well-known in the later writing of literary history, but there are different opinions in the academic community.
Compelling reflection of real life in the 1980s and 1990s. The essay authors believe that the concept itself is no need to change, but in accordance with the actual situation of the development of literature in the 20th century, today must be its meaning to make a new exposition; while recognizing the notion proposed, it is subject to the result of the impact of the Western Center on a scholar, to amend their own point of view is often the case, some public acknowledgment of some undercover, some secretly correction have to express themselves infallible.
The essay authors would like to correct his own point of view, it is practical and realistic performance, but also a clean breast of the ideological sources, in particular the recognition of the influence of westernized, but to have the courage to tell the truth, I finished reading this short article, the deep Author candid style of study touched Western Center on, in my opinion, is the scholar understand modernity in the 1980s, and now some Western scholars say contemporary Western society has entered a new understanding of modernity. modern society, modern outdated mid .80, say the spread of the 1990s, some of our young scholars to the theory of Western scholars move over towards “modern chant in Chinese culture, literature, The End. “In fact, this is yet another Westernization fiddle, or a truly” plagiarism “,” imitation “J vigilant, critical and avoid the devastating consequences of modernization across its trap I think that this will not lead to the end of modernity we have to analyze the Western scholars have different interpretations and criticism towards modernity, but not limited to their modernity made the same time, we can not be a repetition of the modern superstition manufactured modern utopia, we need to build a modern.
View from the historical process of modernity, modernity is the spirit of the modern consciousness of a given historical concreteness, a historic point in various stages of development, the modern connotation has in common, but very different . Academic thinking problems, put forward at that ground, it seems contrary to the then modern requirements, rather than being taken seriously, and even met with criticism; here and now, not only with the existing modern requirements interlinked, but may also become a fundamental part of modernity. For example, after the May 4th Movement debate evaluation of several academic thinking, we proceed from the modern requirements, it can be said with the requirements of the “May Fourth period in generally is consistent with, but is not identical.
“May Fourth New Culture Movement, the Revolution a deep, real cultural revolution campaign is intended to further destruction of the feudal system, defeated the old cultural tradition towards a more thorough modernization of its critical criteria , democracy, scientific ideology, part of it is just the incoming Chinese Marxist thought. these ideas formed the modern awareness of the spirit of the May Fourth period, its point performance for this period of modernity in this period any cultural phenomenon, in the face of the New Culture Movement, in the modernity front of the “May Fourth period, will present its own raison d’etre, and subject to inspection and trade-offs. promotion of the vernacular, is a turning point of my literary narrative; while sinology tendency contrary to the scientific spirit and humanistic spirit with the advocacy, hinder the advance of the New Culture Movement. later the << Xueheng >> send << of Jiayin >> faction, continue to oppose the reform of the literary discourse, They defend the old culture, criticizing a new culture, claiming vernacular literature is not literature, reformist culmination of mockery of sensationalism, no doubt, they are natural times laggards.
Historically glorious achievements of the May Fourth Movement in history, when radical attitude taken by the old culture, from the promotion of historical progress, it is necessary but it is also due to its radical, absolute, making the new culture and lie a rift between the traditional culture, which is the fact that some scholars do not recognize what fracture that inherited, which is an opinion. The one hand we want to catch up with the development of the times, to get rid of backwardness and ignorance of the situation, think only search for role models and prescriptions from foreigners there, otherwise it seems to be difficult to self-reliance. On the other hand, after decades of the May Fourth Movement, We interrupt the traditional, always makes us feel wandering no one to depend on cultural traditions. said that we have a fine cultural traditions of thousands of years, but constantly lambasting ancient culture resulting in burning of the ancient books, out of sight, touch I do not know where is less than the fine cultural tradition, cultural, spiritual poverty resulting in people. This is the last century in particular, to the mentality of the past 50 years, although the situation has improved in the past 20 years.
Coming to an end in the 20th century, the events that occurred centuries, the overall outlook of history today in front of us, this is undoubtedly so that we can get an overall sense of history for us now, the evaluation of the history may not be confined to a short period or a single incident can understand their historical ties to become a holistic evaluation the modernity that spirit of modern consciousness, has a much wider viewing angle, the tolerance of the bearing. revolution in the culture of the past all aspects of thought, in the history of the whole subject to re-evaluate and look at, even in the past been considered conservative cultural thought so too. all factors conducive to today’s cultural development, and ingredients will we adopt to absorb; everything factors not conducive to the development of today’s culture, ingredients, will be shelved. the original progressive phenomenon, may be found to eliminate the moment regarding the isolation, showing the history of the whole light and spacious, with a variety of other phenomena, negative factors, and may even see go in the opposite reasons; been recognized as a negative historical phenomenon, the same may be due to the elimination of the moment regarding the isolation, the overall mutual contact, because of the historical features of the light and spacious positive factors can be found to this phenomenon, I think the history of the whole phenomenon of revelation can be called the history of the New Culture Movement of the the << Xueheng “party attacks is certainly not to be taken as an example, but today, the purpose of academic research, has a new idea, but it is claiming to be “academic theory study, elaborated to seek truth, Advocate national treasures, and assimilate new knowledge.” sinology, their attitude is “Ming the origins of its approach of breakaway with images, to see my country’s culture, with win glory for the value of the sun and the moon; later scholars have research Ferry and Bridge, explore the right track, not to feel powerless and frustrated, futile; blind wantonly attack exclusively Figure destroyed, and thinking also. “and that” the magazine The main Bo pole of books in Western learning, deep glimpse bottom Austrian; then understand Discrimination, prudently taken Optional … integrated sheets, not to the hearsay callsign advertised, caught one-sided and ignorant in general also ⑤.
Natural these purposes, the advocate is unable to really implement, it is difficult to achieve Moreover, come to a fork in the road up the other propositions, however, today’s erase the dark history of the flue dust, showing its modern consciousness the spirit; After almost a century twists fold the quest today also contains the spirit and advocate, no doubt, they can become a part of modernity. history, there are a lot of blind wantonly attack “, a large number of exclusively Figure destroyed, it is also true that blindly indiscriminate attacks followed by all the anti-rational destroyed, are destroyed by the practical needs of the historical development.
The overall evaluation of history, we are advocates of the modern way of thinking, it recognizes the historical development in the period of upheaval necessity of revolutionary struggle divided into two necessity, otherwise, new ideas, cultural, and institutional no self-reliance, it is difficult to grow and develop; produce formed on the basis of the criticism, to identify the fully absorb the essence of the old cultural tradition, to cast their own flesh and blood. blindly struggle also argued that the new culture, ideology, only advocating dualism of thinking leads to social disaster today’s modernity should be a kind of rejection exact opposites, negate the the absolute struggle either-or thinking, but also should be a move towards tolerance, dialogue, comprehensive, and create contains necessary one or the other, with a value judgment He also vital thinking.
Autonomy of literary theory and literary theory of the modernity of the new era in China 20 years, by modernity instigated, and strive to the new changes, continue to reflect the modern sense of the spirit of 20 years due to reasons of history, culture, and so on, this is preliminary update in literary theory literary concepts, significant changes in 20 years.
Links to free papers Download Center http://eng.hi138.com
literary theory to explore the issues of modernity, nature and science, humanity, democracy, freedom, equality, the rights of the concept and its history can not be the spirit of the overall point to equate, but they can not be separated with the requirements of modern literary theory, only in accordance with the universal spirit of modernity, and the real state of literary theory presented, starting from the requirements in line with the development trend of, give OK. I thought the requirements of today’s modern literary theory, mainly in literary theory scientific, literary theory to itself, to the self-discipline, autonomy; performance in literary theory to openness, pluralism and dialogue; performance in the promotion of literature human spirit and literary theory to to moderate criticism towards cultural theory, new transformation.
The early 1950s to the late 1970s, China’s literary and art circles popular “literature and art serve politics, literary subordinate political slogan is obvious, here the subject is political, literary completely in a subordinate position, the subjectivity of the literary completely ruled out. The results of the late 1970s when the “Cultural Revolution” politics toward increasingly feudal fascist, theatrical, literary theory, criticism also fallen unbearable, one after another political killing other people, always start from literary criticism, from the “Cultural Revolution “lessons departure, under the guidance of the principle of” emancipating the mind, seeking truth from facts “, no longer mention” literature and art serve politics, literary subordinate political “instead to mention the” art of serving the people, “art for social Doctrine services. ”
This is a timely and significant changes, and also a strong move. Analysis of the two major here, “not to mention”, because the art to become a literary, we should first clarify its doctrinal, literary truly become a literary That is also the inherent autonomy, literary theory with the contingent.
The relationship between literature and politics, modern literary theory, as early as in the beginning of this century, Liang Qichao some of been put out ⑥ This is purely a theory of; discussion in this regard in the 1920s, but also of this nature.
Later this theory on the development of conclusions “literary subordinate political” art serve politics “extraordinary period in the history of this is necessary, but also played a good role in society.
This theory from the 1950s onwards, gradually became a political requirements, has become a reflection of the policies of certain political demands. So the theory is reduced to a policy and requirements of the political, cultural departments, writers and artists have to go to implement.
According to our understanding, the so-called policy, mostly in some sort of theoretical guidance to ensure that certain political, social idea was implemented and developed certain measures and means of social power, wealth distribution, redistribution of the various provisions and limitations. policy always has a bloc, in the process of its implementation mandatory. assess the situation, due to the characteristics of the seasonal nature of the ground, flexibility, mandatory, it is policy.
The policy is the behavior of a power, mix together the literary theory and policy, policy on possible alternatives to literary theory, to curb the literary theory itself continues to explore and forward, the elimination of the theory of school management and self-discipline after .50 early decades, something is such development in China’s literary and art circles, and the fact that only literary policy without literary theory, literary and art circles and some responsible person speech often the name of literature, literary theory, various summary, but not actually exploring literary theory, but to dominate the discourse of the power of interpretation of this theory, a grim batch after batch processing literary dissidents ideological, literary theory pushed into the air knife and biting frost “impasse theoretical exploration is actually foreclosed everything discrepancy with the provisions of this policy, the echoes of theoretical perspectives, views, by the intervention of the powers ravaged policy and theory should not be confused with the fact that on can not be mixed, but the power can make the integration of the late 1970s, early 1980s, not mention in literary literary art serve politics, no longer mentioning subordinate political slogan, and replaced by the literary to serve the people, serve socialism, which shows that over the past few decades, indeed literary theory and literary policy mix, policy alternative, the theoretical theory can be corrected, but it seems there is no alternative to the one that.
The theory is different from the policy is obvious. Theory, in particular, has become a scientific theory, always out of the real-life needs, and to adapt to the needs of the people practice activities, so the theory has a distinct practical characteristics. The theory is used to clarify some natural phenomenon, or social phenomenon, or a variety of the human spirit phenomenon reveals it generates constitute its evolution, export its results, indicating its future, so to have self-discipline. Theory on their own Theoretical exist theoretical has its own logic, rigorous reasoning, so as to constitute a scientific theory of this discipline, knowledge system. theoretical reason to explore and to say the things the truth and try to illustrate the universal character of things and is unique, so is always the pursuit of truth by reasoning, rather than rely on the virtual press, do not rely on external forces forced, do not rely on the scary people believe a theory, is convinced of its truth, that is theoretical; does not believe it is because it contained many errors, perverse, that does not make sense. Historical experience shows that, relying on powerful deter sex to impose the so-called theory, are unreliable. Forcibly perfusion, may succeed for a time, once the fallacy and failure, the consequences will be catastrophic. Theoretical own principled, adaptability, and seasonal, but a matter of principle is the main, and never mandatory. theory with the times, historic features, it can in the History of the Inquisition and constantly improve themselves, to complete their own in a deepening understanding of the formation, in the metaphysical sublimation constantly in amorphous, but without changes in policy, feel free to substitute any theory the progress and development of value-added lies in its doctrine, to form the theory of value-added and innovative. policy as a means, it was adapted to needs, can promote the coordination and development of the real relationship, reflecting its “wise”, but it does not matter the value value-added. A valuable theoretical system, but in some respects was more reasonable and complete some, but may not always one size fits all, the world does not exist such a panacea theory. Fact, a theory often feasible here, it may not be feasible elsewhere must take some kind of theory as a panacea, this is a theory-kai, the more theoretical superstition, this is the tool of reason and ignorant attempt to create performance in this century , instrumental rationality and superstition movement caused by the disaster to the people there are too many and too much at the same time a theoretical system, due to their own theoretical system is too tight and can not absorb the strengths of the other theory, some theoretical components, refused to rich and enrich themselves, which will inevitably lead to their exclusion and self-enclosed, to make their own theoretical rigid. then this theory to its own limitations revealed It shows the power of the universal character of things shrinking whenever the passage of time a theoretical doctrine likely will lose its charm, and when the new and the new generation of social practice need a new theory and its Academic will timely, and to influence the practice.
The progress of literary theory, continue to rely on theoretical accumulation but now, its doctrine is distorted, the accumulation is interrupted and an interrupt is decades, the theory naturally stagnant or even destroyed. Literature the fate of the theory is that, other disciplines, and the second 50 years of this century, compared with the first 50 years, nearly 30 years after the early 1950s, literary theory Corner extremely decay and desolation, which is why this period is not a literary theory everyone reason the historical profession in the field of philosophy, the same is true in the past few decades, under the control of the will to power, modernity is anti-modernity feudal replaced and is unimpeded in such a long time, and indeed very deep, think of them.
Western culture towards truly modern, generally began in the second 10 years of this century ⑦ the beginning, of course, may have to push before Baudelaire era .19-century Western scholars including Russian scholars put forward the independence of art 20th century early foreign literary theory autonomy proposed also require literary theory back on itself, but its contents and Literary Theory in China in the 1980s, returned to their own requirements. difference lies in the autonomy of literary theory requirements, freed from the shackles of political obtained its independence, literary theory literary theory, to understand their own doctrine. the Western Literary so-called independence, autonomy, is simply the study of literature itself, to get rid of Literary Criticism the study of the so-called external research methods, that is, to get rid of the so-called psychology-the study of history, social studies, the impression of research, the writer biographical research, the study of literature to their own problems to study literary works, such as the works constitute factors, rhythm , metrical, stylistic, narrative, literary types, evaluation literary studies toward the so-called internal research. due to the one-sidedness of the research-oriented Western literary theory in the later 70 years of historical process, internal research occupies a dominant position, and song do research in literary works its wonderful, multi invention However, this orientation has great one-sided nature did not make the literary theory truly back on itself, because it is literature itself some components dismissed out , literary theory is still incomplete. different from our Western Literary own scholarly research, after a variety of social unrest, the frequency by the scourge of war, but not interrupted due to the strong suppression and a faction then one each advertised continueth until the late 1970s, many scholars, including structural theorists that the internal limitations of the study have been obvious, such research has not clarify the problem of the many aspects of the literary phenomenon. In the 1980s, many scholars can not tolerate the internal research, have to get rid of the framework of this study, and turned to external or advocated a variety of the theoretical banner and the so-called culture criticism, or contributed to the literary study of the combination of internal and external, to make literature theory to obtain a more complete autonomy, which also reflects the literature itself, literary studies doctrinal modernity.
The late 1970s, we have in the earlier two “not to mention” of literary theory from the slave state of extreme backwardness lose self, go on their own to restore the beginning of the century, there have been theoretical exploration and literary self-discipline scientific exploration. literary theory toward itself, to the self-discipline of scientific inquiry, which is the minimum conditions of the modern literary theory, it can be said that this is the literary theory of scientific rationality and the spirit of modern consciousness, modernity initial manifestation.
Naturally, the two “not to mention”, not to say that literature has nothing to do with politics, but rather that the two are not subordinate relationship, which is the positive side but can not fully understand the relationship between the two, in the creation and theories, but also generate the new situation. writers and commentators, pain uncoordinated relations in politics for decades, have asked the Literature and politics at this juncture, argumentation literature and politics separate, literary act of aesthetic creation with writer nature, literary politics are not mutually related, hope the political intervention literature, literature and politics divorce, etc., these feelings are understandable. Currently, the above point of view about the relationship between literature and politics, generally showed two tendencies, a form of cultural criticism , some of whom actually explore the political issues directly, you can say, I can also say that not only requires political intervention. Indeed, this is free for this freedom, opinions vary, here we have no comment. ideological, literary and artistic creation, which can actually be divided into two aspects., although the public opinion on literature and politics to the separation to divorce, but some of the writers is clearly in their own works, ridicule, mocking political; digestion, the deconstruction of political, so went to negate any value of standards to the point where only its superb text, style comment on, and asked to comment, otherwise political criticism, political criticism is to stick to criticize the second in critical the political strength intervention literary forming a pure artistic tendencies, that is, trying to stay away from politics, and even social life, literature in isolation from other social relations outside some writers, at once keen games to speak, a language quiz-type activities. When this kind of writing is unsustainable (also exist), and transferred to a physical writing, to improvise something purely incidental, or resolve historical, or from the “new state” to “status” of writing. fact, the literary works can not write politics, and politics separate, but literature and life are inseparable, and politics is a part of life, the literary creation is difficult to avoid the political.
The world-famous “explosion of literature in Latin America, which is a social the highly political literature, many famous novels depict some of the social and political events. Strong but the social, political, did not affect them the original art, Irony so they have sprung up everywhere in the world literature, is unique. course, to fully estimate the social and political conditions of our writers, the difficulty, and their environment is very different since the new era of many young writers, some famous writer once Latin America as an example of their writing deliberately imitate, but they are afraid of the social and political issues, so it is only skin deep learning, the lack of a large-minded Latin writers, national human the survival of consciousness and humanity penetration the Paradox in force. their work trying to leave the social and eager to improve their own aesthetic level, screen, often ideologically very thin, shriveled, lack of artistic Guanghua, does not have a strong aesthetic ability to think critically, expressive of the depth of human nature, which is the need to have a hole through the force of ideas will. According to the newspapers disclosed, revered by the young writers in China Latin American writer Gabriel García Márquez and Vargas slightly Sa were raised over the country, but they are not to accept the compliment of our young writers, even teach writing experience, but to understand the future of Chinese socialism. Garcia Marquez “If you want to know the current social situation in China in the 1990s, the proposed about socialist future and destiny “, it is learned, his long-term concern is these issues; Vargas Llosa thought,” the literature first is social speech, followed by the literature itself ‘, ⑧ in some people, this is really the right time, or simply vulgar sociology! probably because of the situation, a different mentality, thinking, courage, different, so they come to our country, actually failed to meet see a famous writer on pure literature to explore, and did not leave the kind of like Tagore to China in the 1930s, met with China’s literary and art circles bigwigs of the elephants.