加拿大作业代写Research Paper Proposal The Purpose of This Research
The fundamental beliefs in the US are freedom, democracy, and equality. And many government policies and regulations are based on these beliefs, such as the immigrant policies. Sometimes, in order to insist on these beliefs, the government has to shoulder economic burdens and make political concessions. According to the current immigrant policies in the US, children born in the US should be regarded as citizens of the US and enjoy social welfares with equal rights, even though their parents are illegal immigrants. But this policy brings a huge difficulty in the population control and the immigrant management, as well as a huge financial burden on the social welfare system. This research paper aims at exploring the possibility of solving this problem by abandoning the concept of birthright citizenship for illegal immigrants. From my perspective, the US should abandon the concept of birthright citizenship for illegal immigrants and replace this policy with a limited acceptance of newborn children as citizens for qualified illegal immigrants.
The Intended Audience
This research paper is mainly for the government policy makers, immigrants, and related social welfare facilities. According to the article “Anchor Babies: No More U.S. Citizenship” by Roy Beck, the widespread adoption of birthright citizenship policies have aroused many social problems in public welfare, taxes, the unemployment rate, etc. This is a political problem, a social problem, and an ethical problem. In the broad sense, this topic is relevant to almost every American citizen whose interest may be affected due to the immigrant policy change. But this paper focuses on those facilities and the government that has the right to make immigrant policy changes, as well as those illegal immigrants and those foreigners who intend to immigrate to the US.
My Role in the Argument
Due to some irresistible factors, like wars, natural disasters, and social violence, the US should open its gate and provide shelter for those immigrants. But that does not mean that this temporary assistance will provide opportunities for immigrants to earn citizenships in the US without taking the legal paths. Children of illegal immigrants born in the US should be given humanitarian support and care, but that does not mean that these children could earn citizenships simply because they are born in the US. If they share the same social welfare and citizenship as other normal American native citizens, is that democratic and fair for those native citizens? And this birthright citizenship enables these children to get citizenships for their illegal immigrant parents after they reach 21 years old. This policy will cause great financial pressures on the social welfare system and great difficulties in controlling the increasing population and managing the immigrants. Articles like Roy Beck’s “Anchor Babies: No More U.S. Citizenship” provide detailed examples and data on this aspect. These materials show that the birthright citizenship policy has brought an increasing population of illegal immigrants, as well as an increasing financial and social welfare pressure for the US government. These are facts that people could not deny. These facts have to be seriously considered when the US is making its immigrant policies based on the national belief of democracy, freedom, and equality.
Opening Statement, Argument or Hypothesis
The birthright citizenship policy in the US should be abandoned. Though the US is a country founded on the belief of democracy, freedom, and equality, its policies should not pursue the democracy and equality without the consideration of real facts. Some may argue that the US should follow its democratic and humanitarian beliefs for those innocent newborn babies. However, the abandonment of the birthright citizenship policy is not opposite to this democratic and humanitarian spirit. These children could earn citizenships after their parents earn citizenships or after they are adopted by native citizens. Otherwise, these children will be brought up in social welfare facilities and earn a relatively limited social rights. This is not discrimination. Democracy does not mean to offer absolute freedom and equality for everyone, but to offer the freedom and equality according to each individual’s contributions, responsibilities, and abilities.
Methodology, Materials and Data
Since this topic is concerned with many big important political and social sections, the research method and materials used in this research will include immigrant policies and regulations concerning birthright citizenship for illegal immigrants on the government official website, articles explaining the foundation of the birthright citizenship policy, and related data such as the number of illegal immigrants, the birth rate of illegal immigrants’ babies, the amount the social welfare system should pay to accept a new baby, etc. Then analyze these materials and data to find out both the positive and the negative influences this birthright citizenship policy. At the same time, conclude the reason why this policy is adopted. Then based on the reasons for its existence, argue one by one why it should be abandoned and what part should be improved. If possible, compare the US immigrant policy concerning birthright citizenship with other developed countries, like Japan and Germany, to find out what could be improved to reduce the social burden caused by this policy. Also, to make this research more detailed and practical, illegal immigrant parents, government officers, and social facility officers could be interviewed if available.
The expected outcome of this paper is to provide a concept of exploring the possibility of abandoning the birthright citizenship to solve related social problems. The future focus should be on how to achieve that by reaching the balance of the ethical discussion, the political discussion, and the social welfare discussion. The birthright citizenship policy creates the impractical democracy and equality that fail to match with the current situation. There should be other policies to replace it with a limitation and a moderate adjustment according to the reality.